Is this model broken down properly?

First I wrote the circumstance was – I disagree with Duncan’s belief. As I worked through the steps (TFAR) I realized the true circumstances is – Duncan made a statement
T – He thinks his kids are better than mine
F – attacked
A – defend my kids more while judging his
R – Duncan stops talking with me

C – Duncan made a statement
T – first I put a question here (what questions can I ask to find out more) then I reframed thought to – Let’s Discover more
F – inquisitive
A – Ask Duncan powerful questions to discover more
R – We have a conversation and I get to know more about my husband

I did the intentional one by deciding on what feeling I wanted to have.

Am I getting the hang of this?