I have a lovely client who says that she can’t help feeling negative energy from people because she has psychic abilities, and says that the model doesn’t account for people who are psychic.

A recent example of this is that she took an online class and immediately felt that the instructor’s energy was “off”, which made my client feel anxious, and so she acted “like a weirdo” and couldn’t concentrate, and the result was that she didn’t like the class.

I started to show her her model:

C: The class
T: “The instructor’s energy is off”
F: Anxious
A: Act like a weirdo, distracted
R: She didn’t like the class (Because my client’s energy was “off”)

This is when she said that the model doesn’t account for people with psychic abilities, and that she could feel the energy without having thoughts, and that the anxiousness of “the instructor’s energy was off” was what she felt, not a thought.

So I decided to show her that she’s having thoughts about the energy that she felt, and I put the energy in the C line, despite it not being provable in court. I asked her what she made it mean that the energy was off.

We discovered:

C: Energy (feels “off”)
T: “I’m not in control.”
F: Anxious
A: Act like a weirdo, distracted
R: She didn’t like the class (because she wasn’t in control of herself)

This was a revelation to her and she got excited about it and I felt like it helped her see something more about how she was having thoughts about what she was feeling.

I was wondering if this was the right to approach this, and is there anything I should keep in mind for the future?
She often brings similar problems, and so do I just continue to keep the energy in the C line and help her see and manage her thoughts about it? Should I keep it as simply “energy” or should I put the type of energy?

Thank you!